Bend, OR – U.S. Representative Cliff Bentz (R-Ore.) recently addressed several key issues surrounding the future of federal spending, Medicaid, and tax policy in a candid interview on OPB’s Think Out Loud. The conversation focused on efforts by Republicans in Congress to significantly reduce the federal budget over the next decade, with Bentz playing a central role on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, particularly its health care subcommittee.
Bentz, a three-term lawmaker from Ontario, Oregon, argued that the nation’s current spending trajectory, particularly on Medicaid, is unsustainable. With a proposed cut of $880 billion from the federal budget over the next 10 years, Bentz emphasized that health care would be a key focus in the debate, alongside other spending reductions across various government agencies.
One of the primary reforms being considered is the introduction of work requirements for Medicaid recipients. Bentz explained that those able to work, but not currently employed, would need to either find a job or demonstrate an effort to do so in order to remain eligible for Medicaid benefits. He acknowledged the critique that such a policy might increase bureaucratic red tape, but he remained optimistic about its potential to reduce costs, asserting that it could have a “substantial positive impact.”
When asked specifically about potential cuts to Medicaid that might result in Oregonians losing access to health care, Bentz was firm in his response. He clarified that he would not support a measure that would result in individuals losing coverage if they were eligible for it. However, he indicated that he would back measures aimed at removing individuals who fraudulently participate in the program or do not meet the original eligibility criteria. “If Oregonians are kicked off the plan, it’s because they don’t deserve to be on it,” Bentz said, adding that he is committed to improving the program’s efficiency.
Despite the ongoing discussion about Medicaid cuts, Bentz downplayed concerns that his proposed budget changes would lead to widespread loss of coverage. “Who in the world is scaring them?” he said, challenging those who claim that Medicaid cuts will drastically reduce benefits. He reiterated that the current level of spending on health care programs is not sustainable, especially as the U.S. faces a national debt that exceeds $2 trillion annually.
On the topic of extending the Trump-era tax cuts, Bentz argued that failing to do so would result in one of the largest tax hikes in U.S. history, with substantial consequences for small businesses and taxpayers. He expressed concern that allowing the cuts to expire could harm the economy and lead to higher taxes for middle-class families.
Bentz also addressed questions about the role of Congress in overseeing the executive branch’s actions. While acknowledging that the judicial branch is responsible for determining the constitutionality of executive orders, Bentz emphasized that the administration recognizes the need for legislative support in implementing policies. He noted that, as a Republican, he generally supports the Trump administration’s efforts to reduce spending and shrink the federal workforce, though he recognized the complexity of doing so within constitutional boundaries.
Throughout the interview, Bentz underscored his commitment to reducing federal spending while ensuring that vital programs like Medicaid continue to serve those in need. He called for a balanced approach, one that improves the efficiency of government programs without unduly affecting vulnerable populations.
As the House continues to debate these critical issues, Bentz’s perspective as a key member of the Energy and Commerce Committee will likely play a significant role in shaping the future of Medicaid and federal fiscal policy.
